Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:46

What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
This Everyday Interest Could Reduce Your Risk of Alzheimer’s - SciTechDaily
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What would it take for you to consider yourself a "Swiftie" like Flavor Flav?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Alaska Airlines to launch Seattle-to-Rome nonstop flights in 2026 - KING5.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why does an older married man turn bisexual?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What Happens to Your Blood Pressure When You Eat Dark Chocolate Every Day? - Verywell Health
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
ESPN announces TV start times, windows for 2025 SEC football season - Southeastern Conference